3 Comments
User's avatar
Natalie Arriola's avatar

The Beatles and The Stones both suck. Also there are many other contemporaries of Nirvana that were just as good or better. Not that I don’t love Nirvana and especially that MTV Unplugged album, but I never listen to them now. I still listen to NIN and Soundgarden (insanely underrated), but never Nirvana.

Natalie Arriola's avatar

Oh yeah and Radiohead is not just some failed Nirvana offshoot. They are a totally unique band and the only one mentioned thus far that is still relevant today imo.

Paul Gresty's avatar

Controversial take: Pearl Jam became much more interesting once their record sales started to dip (also around the time that Eddie Vedder started taking on a bigger songwriting role). While later albums like Riot Act, Backspacer, and Lightning Bolt don't have the every-track-is-a-hit feel of the first couple of albums, the gems in there are reeeeeally excellent. And maybe they shine a bit more brightly from being pulled out from amongst the weeds.